www.loltestab.fora.pl Forum Index www.loltestab.fora.pl
Just a simple test
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   GalleriesGalleries   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

"it seems mainly symbolic

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    www.loltestab.fora.pl Forum Index -> Forum testowe
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
cheapbag214s




Joined: 27 Jun 2013
Posts: 17953
Read: 0 topics

Warns: 0/5
Location: England

PostPosted: Wed 18:45, 06 Nov 2013    Post subject: "it seems mainly symbolic

Bill to separate personal banking and investment seen as symbolic
WASHINGTON, July 12 () -- Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., said it was time to resurrect the Glass-Steagall Act that for decades separated investment banking from personal banking."Over the past five years, we've made real progress,[url=http://www.trueireligion.com]True Religion Sale[/url]," Warren said. However, she added, "The bigger banks continue to engage in dangerous high-risk practices that could once again put our economy at risk."Proponents of a new version of the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 say it would break up the huge banks that are so large, a failure at one could create a massive financial crisis and potentially an economic downturn. The bill proposed by Warren and co-sponsored by Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., called the 21st Century Glass-Steagall Act, would force banks with federally insured consumer deposits to give up their trading operations, the Times said.Realistically, however, "it seems mainly symbolic," said Professor Phillip Swagel at the University of Maryland School of Public Policy.The chances of passing the bill are slim, but the bill may force bank regulations back into the foreground, he said.Currently, not only would big banks lobby hard to keep their investment divisions, but regulators such as the U.S. Treasury Department and the U.S. Federal Reserve would be unlikely to get behind the bill, the Times said.Some also say the major flaw is that the Glass-Steagall Act would not have prevented the 2008 financial crisis, given two of the biggest financial firm collapses involved investment banks Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns, which would not have been subject to the law.The original Glass-Steagall Act was in place from 1933 to 1999 when it was repealed.Through those years there were no financial crises and the gross domestic product grew each year by an average of 4 percent."For about 70 years,[url=http://www.trueireligion.com]True Religion Jeans Outlet[/url], Glass-Steagall managed to keep the riskier, more damaging part of Wall Street away from what should be the boring, straightforward side of finance. It was the height of stupidity repealing Glass-Steagall," said Barry Ritholtz, chief executive officer of asset management firm FusionIQ.


The post has been approved 0 times
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    www.loltestab.fora.pl Forum Index -> Forum testowe All times are GMT + 2 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

fora.pl - załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Regulamin